SCENARIOS
Three scenarios the engine is built for.
We are a seed-stage company. The stories below are illustrative: they show the shape of work the engine is designed to handle, drawn from the kind of engagements our pilots target. They are not case studies of shipped customer outcomes.
SCENARIO.01 // CAPITAL ALLOCATION
A fund evaluating a renewable interconnection.
- SITUATION
- An infrastructure investor is evaluating a direct acquisition at the late stage of an interconnection queue. Their internal process for a DD pack of this scope typically runs six weeks. The seller's exclusivity window is shorter than that.
- CONSTRAINT
- The team needs a defensible DD pack covering interconnection risk, system impact study findings, curtailment exposure, and PPA credit quality, on a schedule their usual advisors cannot meet. The artifact has to be readable by the fund's investment committee.
- WHAT WE'D DO
- Cadence Grid ingests the full interconnection queue docket, the system impact study, the cluster restudy filings, and the proposed PPA. Agent workers draft each section; the lead analyst reviews as sections clear the approval gate. The engagement runs inside a customer-VPC deployment where no data leaves the fund's cloud account.
- TARGET PATTERN
- The engine is designed to produce a signed, source-linked DD pack inside two weeks for a workflow of this shape. Real timelines vary with document availability and reviewer bandwidth. This is the target pattern, not a guaranteed outcome.
SCENARIO.02 // PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
A contractor responding to a federal tender.
- SITUATION
- A prime contractor is responding to a federal RFQ with a compressed submission window. Scope spans multiple technical volumes, a long list of mandatory compliance clauses, and a pricing exhibit that has to reconcile against internal cost systems.
- CONSTRAINT
- Their existing capture process assumes a longer runway. Under a compressed clock the two outcomes are a no-bid or a bid where compliance gaps surface at the evaluator's desk. Neither is acceptable.
- WHAT WE'D DO
- Cadence Bid parses the RFQ, builds a clause-by-clause compliance matrix against the customer's clause library, and drafts the first pass of each technical volume from library prior art. A senior capture lead reviews and signs each volume as it clears. Pricing is modeled against a game-theoretic baseline derived from past awards in the same NAICS code.
- TARGET PATTERN
- The engine is designed to hold a response together under a compressed clock without sacrificing clause-level compliance. We are targeting this pattern with our early Cadence Bid pilots.
SCENARIO.03 // PIPELINE TRIAGE
A utility triaging a filings backlog.
- SITUATION
- A regional utility has accumulated a multi-year backlog of interconnection cluster-study filings it has not triaged. The backlog is blocking buildable-site planning across its territories.
- CONSTRAINT
- Each filing runs 400 to 1,200 pages. A single internal planner can clear one filing every two to three days. There is no internal headcount to clear the backlog without either hiring or a tooling intervention.
- WHAT WE'D DO
- Cadence Grid ingests the full backlog and runs a triage pass. Each filing is scored against the utility's own buildability criteria. Filings below threshold are archived with a one-page rationale. Filings above threshold are promoted to full DD review. A planner reviews and signs each triage decision.
- TARGET PATTERN
- The engine is designed to turn a multi-month backlog into a handful of reviewer decisions per day. Throughput depends on filing quality and reviewer availability. We target this shape of engagement directly.
DISCLAIMER
Scenarios above are illustrative. Felixfusion is a seed-stage company. We have not completed the engagements described above as shipped customer deliveries. We are actively looking for pilot partners who fit one of these shapes.